The Complexity of Optimal Monotonic Planning: The Bad, The Good, and The Causal Graph

Authors

  • Carmel Domshlak Technion
  • Anton Nazarenko Technion

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v24i1.13657

Keywords:

Planning, Complexity, Delete relaxation, Monotonic relaxation, Causal graph

Abstract

For almost two decades, monotonic, or ``delete free,'' relaxation has been one of the key auxiliary tools in the practice of domain-independent deterministic planning. In the particular contexts of both satisficing and optimal planning, it  underlies most state-of-the-art heuristic functions. While satisficing planning for monotonic tasks is polynomial-time, optimal planning for monotonic tasks is NP-equivalent. We took a step towards a fine-grained classification of worst-case time complexity of optimal monotonic planning, with a focus on ``what gets harder" and ``what gets easier" when switching from optimal planning to optimal relaxed planning, in the context of finite-domain planning task representations.

Downloads

Published

2014-05-11

How to Cite

Domshlak, C., & Nazarenko, A. (2014). The Complexity of Optimal Monotonic Planning: The Bad, The Good, and The Causal Graph. Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 24(1), 527. https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v24i1.13657