Generalized Linear Integer Numeric Planning

Authors

  • Xiaoyou Lin Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • Qingliang Chen Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • Liangda Fang Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China Pazhou Lab, Guangzhou 510330, China Guangxi Key Laboratory of Trusted Software, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
  • Quanlong Guan Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China Guangdong Institute of Smart Education, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • Weiqi Luo Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • Kaile Su Griffith University, Brisbane 4111, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v32i1.19807

Keywords:

Generalized Planning, Numeric Planning, Linear Integer Arithmetic, Regular Expressions

Abstract

Classical planning aims to find a sequence of actions that guarantees goal achievement from an initial state. The representative framework of classical planning is based on propositional logic. Due to the weak expressiveness of propositional logic, many applications of interest cannot be formalized as a classical planning problem. Some extensions such as numeric planning and generalized planning (GP) are therefore proposed. Qualitative numeric planning (QNP) is a decidable class of numeric and generalized extensions and serves as a numeric abstraction of GP. However, QNP is still far from being perfect and needs further improvement. In this paper, we introduce another generalized version of numeric planning, namely generalized linear integer numeric planning(GLINP), which is a more suitable abstract framework of GP than QNP. In addition, we develop a general framework to synthesize solutions to GLINP problems. Finally, we evaluate our approach on a number of benchmarks, and experimental results justify the effectiveness and scalability of our proposed approach.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-13

How to Cite

Lin, X., Chen, Q., Fang, L., Guan, Q., Luo, W., & Su, K. (2022). Generalized Linear Integer Numeric Planning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 32(1), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v32i1.19807