Crowdsourcing for Participatory Democracies: Efficient Elicitation of Social Choice Functions

Authors

  • David Lee Stanford University
  • Ashish Goel Stanford University
  • Tanja Aitamurto Stanford University
  • Helene Landemore Yale University

Abstract

We present theoretical and empirical results demonstrating the usefulness of social choice functions in crowdsourcing for participatory democracies. First, we demonstrate the scalability of social choice functions by defining a natural notion of epsilon-approximation, and giving algorithms which efficiently elicit such approximations for two prominent social choice functions: the Borda rule and the Condorcet winner. This result circumvents previous prohibitive lower bounds and is surprisingly strong: even if the number of ideas is as large as the number of participants, each participant will only have to make a logarithmic number of comparisons, an exponential improvement over the linear number of comparisons previously needed. Second, we apply these ideas to Finland's recent off-road traffic law reform, an experiment on participatory democracy in real life. This allows us to verify the scaling predicted in our theory and show that the constant involved is also not large. In addition, by collecting data on the time that users take to complete rankings of varying sizes, we observe that eliciting partial rankings can further decrease elicitation time as compared to the common method of eliciting pairwise comparisons.

Downloads

Published

2014-09-05

How to Cite

Lee, D., Goel, A., Aitamurto, T., & Landemore, H. (2014). Crowdsourcing for Participatory Democracies: Efficient Elicitation of Social Choice Functions. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, 2(1). Retrieved from https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/HCOMP/article/view/13150