Perceptions of Retrospective Edits, Changes, and Deletion on Social Media

Authors

  • Günce Su Yılmaz University of Chicago
  • Fiona Gasaway University of Chicago
  • Blase Ur University of Chicago
  • Mainack Mondal University of Chicago IIT Kharagpur

Keywords:

Human computer interaction; social media tools; navigation and visualization

Abstract

Many social media sites permit users to delete, edit, anonymize, or otherwise modify past posts. These mechanisms enable users to protect their privacy, but also to essentially change the past. We investigate perceptions of the necessity and acceptability of these mechanisms. Drawing on boundary-regulation theories of privacy, we first identify how users who reshared or responded to a post could be impacted by its retrospective modification. These mechanisms can cause boundary turbulence by recontextualizing past content and limiting accountability. In contrast, not permitting modification can lessen privacy and perpetuate harms of regrettable content. To understand how users perceive these mechanisms, we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews. Participants deemed retrospective modification crucial for fixing past mistakes. Nonetheless, they worried about the potential for deception through selective changes or removal. Participants were aware retrospective modification impacts others, yet felt these impacts could be minimized through context-aware usage of markers and proactive notifications.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-22

How to Cite

Yılmaz, G. S., Gasaway, F., Ur, B., & Mondal, M. (2021). Perceptions of Retrospective Edits, Changes, and Deletion on Social Media. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 15(1), 841-852. Retrieved from https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/18108