More than Meets the Tie: Examining the Role of Interpersonal Relationships in Social Networks

Authors

  • Minje Choi University of Michigan
  • Ceren Budak University of Michigan
  • Daniel M. Romero University of Michigan
  • David Jurgens University of Michigan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18045

Keywords:

Text categorization; topic recognition; demographic/gender/age identification, Organizational and group behavior mediated by social media; interpersonal communication mediated by social media, Subjectivity in textual data; sentiment analysis; polarity/opinion identification and extraction, linguistic analyses of social media behavior, Social network analysis; communities identification; expertise and authority discovery

Abstract

Topics in conversations depend in part on the type of interpersonal relationship between speakers, such as friendship, kinship, or romance. Identifying these relationships can provide a rich description of how individuals communicate and reveal how relationships influence the way people share information. Using a dataset of more than 9.6M dyads of Twitter users, we show how relationship types influence language use, topic diversity, communication frequencies, and diurnal patterns of conversations. These differences can be used to predict the relationship between two users, with the best predictive model achieving a macro F1 score of 0.70. We also demonstrate how relationship types influence communication dynamics through the task of predicting future retweets. Adding relationships as a feature to a strong baseline model increases the F1 and recall by 1% and 2%. The results of this study suggest relationship types have the potential to provide new insights into how communication and information diffusion occur in social networks.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-22

How to Cite

Choi, M., Budak, C., Romero, D. M., & Jurgens, D. (2021). More than Meets the Tie: Examining the Role of Interpersonal Relationships in Social Networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 15(1), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v15i1.18045