Stacked Generalization Learning to Analyze Teenage Distress

Authors

  • Karthik Dinakar Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Emily Weinstein Harvard University
  • Henry Lieberman Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Robert Selman Harvard University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14527

Keywords:

stacked generalization, prevention science, text classification, topic models

Abstract

The internet has become a resource for adolescents who are distressed by social and emotional problems. Social network analysis can provide new opportunities for helping people seeking support online, but only if we understand the salient issues that are highly relevant to participants personal circumstances. In this paper, we present a stacked generalization modeling approach to analyze an online community supporting adolescents under duress. While traditional predictive supervised methods rely on robust hand-crafted feature space engineering, mixed initiative semi-supervised topic models are often better at extracting high-level themes that go beyond such feature spaces. We present a strategy that combines the strengths of both these types of models inspired by Prevention Science approaches which deals with the identification and amelioration of risk factors that predict to psychological, psychosocial, and psychiatric disorders within and across populations (in our case teenagers) rather than treat them post-facto. In this study, prevention scientists used a social science thematic analytic approach to code stories according to a fine-grained analysis of salient social, developmental or psychological themes they deemed relevant, and these are then analyzed by a society of models. We show that a stacked generalization of such an ensemble fares better than individual binary predictive models.

Downloads

Published

2014-05-16

How to Cite

Dinakar, K., Weinstein, E., Lieberman, H., & Selman, R. (2014). Stacked Generalization Learning to Analyze Teenage Distress. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14527