Self-Censorship on Facebook


  • Sauvik Das Carnegie Mellon University
  • Adam Kramer Facebook, Inc.



social media, social networking sites, Facebook, self-censorship, censorship, audience selection, imagined audience


We report results from an exploratory analysis examining “last-minute” self-censorship, or content that is filtered after being written, on Facebook. We collected data from 3.9 million users over 17 days and associate self-censorship behavior with features describing users, their social graph, and the interactions between them. Our results indicate that 71% of users exhibited some level of last-minute self-censorship in the time period, and provide specific evidence supporting the theory that a user’s “perceived audience” lies at the heart of the issue: posts are censored more frequently than comments, with status updates and posts directed at groups censored most frequently of all sharing use cases investigated. Furthermore, we find that: people with more boundaries to regulate censor more; males censor more posts than females and censor even more posts with mostly male friends than do females, but censor no more comments than females; people who exercise more control over their audience censor more content; and, users with more politically and age diverse friends censor less, in general.




How to Cite

Das, S., & Kramer, A. (2021). Self-Censorship on Facebook. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 7(1), 120-127.