Modeling Spread of Disease from Social Interactions

Authors

  • Adam Sadilek University of Rochester
  • Henry Kautz University of Rochester
  • Vincent Silenzio University of Rochester

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v6i1.14235

Keywords:

social network analysis, computational epidemiology, location-based reasoning, machine learning, text classification, disease spread, public health

Abstract

Research in computational epidemiology to date has concentrated on coarse-grained statistical analysis of populations, often synthetic ones. By contrast, this paper focuses on fine-grained modeling of the spread of infectious diseases throughout a large real-world social network. Specifically, we study the roles that social ties and interactions between specific individuals play in the progress of a contagion. We focus on public Twitter data, where we find that for every health-related message there are more than 1,000 unrelated ones. This class imbalance makes classification particularly challenging. Nonetheless, we present a framework that accurately identifies sick individuals from the content of online communication. Evaluation on a sample of 2.5 million geo-tagged Twitter messages shows that social ties to infected, symptomatic people, as well as the intensity of recent co-location, sharply increase one's likelihood of contracting the illness in the near future. To our knowledge, this work is the first to model the interplay of social activity, human mobility, and the spread of infectious disease in a large real-world population. Furthermore, we provide the first quantifiable estimates of the characteristics of disease transmission on a large scale without active user participation---a step towards our ability to model and predict the emergence of global epidemics from day-to-day interpersonal interactions.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-03

How to Cite

Sadilek, A., Kautz, H., & Silenzio, V. (2021). Modeling Spread of Disease from Social Interactions. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 6(1), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v6i1.14235