Responsible AI in Media Organizations: Four Case Studies Implementing Ethical Tools in Practice

Authors

  • Maaike Harbers Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences
  • Sophie Horsman Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
  • Pascal Wiggers Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
  • Huib Aldewereld Utrecht University of Applied Sciences
  • Marcio Fuckner Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
  • Coert Van Gemeren Utrecht University of Applied Sciences
  • Oumaima Hajri Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens
  • Floor Schukking Utrecht University of Applied Sciences
  • Nathalie Stembert Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i2.36624

Abstract

Ethical tools are frequently proposed as a means to promote the design and implementation of responsible Artificial Intelligence (AI). Yet many organizations designing and deploying AI make only limited use of ethical tools. This study explores the application of ethical tools for responsible AI in the media sector through four case studies conducted at three Dutch media organizations. Each case study involves the application of an ethical tool to improve the responsible design, development, or deployment of an AI application. The findings reveal that successfully implementing ethical tools is highly contextual, and requires more than their mere availability. Tools must be selected, adapted, or even partly developed to align with specific challenges. Additionally, successful adoption of ethical tools necessitates organizational awareness of AI ethics, knowledge of mitigation strategies, and an organizational governance that supports responsible AI. These insights thus highlight the importance of contextualization and organizational readiness for establishing a responsible AI practice.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-15

How to Cite

Harbers, M., Horsman, S., Wiggers, P., Aldewereld, H., Fuckner, M., Van Gemeren, C., Hajri, O., Schukking, F., & Stembert, N. (2025). Responsible AI in Media Organizations: Four Case Studies Implementing Ethical Tools in Practice. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 8(2), 1219-1230. https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i2.36624