TY - JOUR AU - Kempe, David PY - 2020/04/03 Y2 - 2024/03/29 TI - Communication, Distortion, and Randomness in Metric Voting JF - Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence JA - AAAI VL - 34 IS - 02 SE - AAAI Technical Track: Game Theory and Economic Paradigms DO - 10.1609/aaai.v34i02.5582 UR - https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/5582 SP - 2087-2094 AB - <p>In distortion-based analysis of social choice rules over metric spaces, voters and candidates are jointly embedded in a metric space. Voters rank candidates by non-decreasing distance. The mechanism, receiving only this ordinal (comparison) information, must select a candidate approximately minimizing the sum of distances from all voters to the chosen candidate. It is known that while the Copeland rule and related rules guarantee distortion at most 5, the distortion of many other standard voting rules, such as Plurality, Veto, or <em>k</em>-approval, grows unboundedly in the number <em>n</em> of candidates.</p><p>An advantage of Plurality, Veto, or <em>k</em>-approval with small <em>k</em> is that they require less communication from the voters; all deterministic social choice rules known to achieve constant distortion require voters to transmit their complete rankings of all candidates. This motivates our study of the tradeoff between the distortion and the amount of communication in deterministic social choice rules.</p><p>We show that any one-round deterministic voting mechanism in which each voter communicates only the candidates she ranks in a given set of <em>k</em> positions must have distortion at least 2<em>n-k</em>/<em>k</em>; we give a mechanism achieving an upper bound of <em>O</em>(<em>n</em>/<em>k</em>), which matches the lower bound up to a constant. For more general communication-bounded voting mechanisms, in which each voter communicates <em>b</em> bits of information about her ranking, we show a slightly weaker lower bound of Ω(<em>n</em>/<em>b</em>) on the distortion.</p><p>For randomized mechanisms, Random Dictatorship achieves expected distortion strictly smaller than 3, almost matching a lower bound of 3 − 2/<em>n</em> for any randomized mechanism that only receives each voter's top choice. We close this gap, by giving a simple randomized social choice rule which only uses each voter's first choice, and achieves expected distortion 3 − 2/<em>n</em>.</p> ER -