On Fairness in Decision-Making under Uncertainty: Definitions, Computation, and Comparison

Authors

  • Chongjie Zhang Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Julie Shah Massachusetts Institute of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9699

Keywords:

Fairness, decision-making under uncertainty, solution criterion

Abstract

The utilitarian solution criterion, which has been extensively studied in multi-agent decision making under uncertainty, aims to maximize the sum of individual utilities. However, as the utilitarian solution often discriminates against some agents, it is not desirable for many practical applications where agents have their own interests and fairness is expected. To address this issue, this paper introduces egalitarian solution criteria for sequential decision-making under uncertainty, which are based on the maximin principle. Motivated by different application domains, we propose four maximin fairness criteria and develop corresponding algorithms for computing their optimal policies. Furthermore, we analyze the connections between these criteria and discuss and compare their characteristics.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-04

How to Cite

Zhang, C., & Shah, J. (2015). On Fairness in Decision-Making under Uncertainty: Definitions, Computation, and Comparison. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v29i1.9699

Issue

Section

AAAI Technical Track: Reasoning under Uncertainty