Linguistic Fingerprints of Internet Censorship: The Case of Sina Weibo


  • Kei Yin Ng Montclair State University
  • Anna Feldman Montclair State University
  • Jing Peng Montclair State University



This paper studies how the linguistic components of blogposts collected from Sina Weibo, a Chinese microblogging platform, might affect the blogposts' likelihood of being censored. Our results go along with King et al. (2013)'s Collective Action Potential (CAP) theory, which states that a blogpost's potential of causing riot or assembly in real life is the key determinant of it getting censored. Although there is not a definitive measure of this construct, the linguistic features that we identify as discriminatory go along with the CAP theory. We build a classifier that significantly outperforms non-expert humans in predicting whether a blogpost will be censored. The crowdsourcing results suggest that while humans tend to see censored blogposts as more controversial and more likely to trigger action in real life than the uncensored counterparts, they in general cannot make a better guess than our model when it comes to ‘reading the mind’ of the censors in deciding whether a blogpost should be censored. We do not claim that censorship is only determined by the linguistic features. There are many other factors contributing to censorship decisions. The focus of the present paper is on the linguistic form of blogposts. Our work suggests that it is possible to use linguistic properties of social media posts to automatically predict if they are going to be censored.




How to Cite

Ng, K. Y., Feldman, A., & Peng, J. (2020). Linguistic Fingerprints of Internet Censorship: The Case of Sina Weibo. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34(01), 446-453.



AAAI Special Technical Track: AI for Social Impact