Approximating Problems in Abstract Argumentation with Graph Convolutional Networks (Abstract Reprint)

Authors

  • Lars Malmqvist University of York, Department of Computer Science, York, UK
  • Tangming Yuan University of York, Department of Computer Science, York, UK
  • Peter Nightingale University of York, Department of Computer Science, York, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v40i47.41396

Abstract

In this article, we present a novel approximation approach for abstract argumentation using a customized Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) architecture and a tailored training method. Our approach demonstrates promising results in approximating abstract argumentation tasks across various semantics, setting a new state of the art for performance on certain tasks. We provide a detailed analysis of approximation and runtime performance and propose a new scheme for evaluation. By advancing the state of the art for approximating the acceptability status of abstract arguments, we make theoretical and empirical advances in understanding the limits and opportunities for approximation in this field. Our approach shows potential for creating both general purpose and task-specific approximators and offers insights into the performance differences across benchmarks and semantics.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-14

How to Cite

Malmqvist, L., Yuan, T., & Nightingale, P. (2026). Approximating Problems in Abstract Argumentation with Graph Convolutional Networks (Abstract Reprint). Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 40(47), 39881–39881. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v40i47.41396