Bayesian Meta-Analyses Could Be More: A Case Study in Trial of Labor After a Cesarean-section Outcomes and Complications

Authors

  • Ashley Klein Loftus, Ryu and Bartol OBGYN
  • Edward Raff CrowdStrike University of Maryland, Baltimore County
  • Marcia DesJardin The University of Alabama at Birmingham

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v40i45.41217

Abstract

The meta-analysis's utility is dependent on previous studies having accurately captured the variables of interest, but in medical studies, a key decision variable that impacts a physician's decisions was not captured. This results in an unknown effect size and unreliable conclusions. A Bayesian approach may allow analysis to determine if the claim of a positive effect is still warranted, and we build a Bayesian approach to this common medical scenario. To demonstrate its utility, we assist professional OBGYNs in evaluating Trial of Labor After a Cesarean-section (TOLAC) situations where few interventions are available for patients and find the support needed for physicians to advance patient care.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-14

How to Cite

Klein, A., Raff, E., & DesJardin, M. (2026). Bayesian Meta-Analyses Could Be More: A Case Study in Trial of Labor After a Cesarean-section Outcomes and Complications. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 40(45), 38736–38745. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v40i45.41217

Issue

Section

AAAI Special Track on AI for Social Impact I