To Err Is AI: A Case Study Informing LLM Flaw Reporting Practices

Authors

  • Sean McGregor UL Research Institutes
  • Allyson Ettinger Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
  • Nick Judd UL Research Institutes
  • Paul Albee Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
  • Liwei Jiang Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
  • Kavel Rao Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
  • William H. Smith Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
  • Shayne Longpre Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Avijit Ghosh Hugging Face
  • Christopher Fiorelli Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
  • Michelle Hoang SeedAI
  • Sven Cattell AI Village
  • Nouha Dziri Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i28.35162

Abstract

In August of 2024, 495 hackers generated evaluations in an open-ended bug bounty targeting the Open Language Model (OLMo) from The Allen Institute for AI. A vendor panel staffed by representatives of OLMo's safety program adjudicated changes to OLMo's documentation and awarded cash bounties to participants who successfully demonstrated a need for public disclosure clarifying the intent, capacities, and hazards of model deployment. This paper presents a collection of lessons learned, illustrative of flaw reporting best practices intended to reduce the likelihood of incidents and produce safer large language models (LLMs). These include best practices for safety reporting processes, their artifacts, and safety program staffing.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-11

How to Cite

McGregor, S., Ettinger, A., Judd, N., Albee, P., Jiang, L., Rao, K., … Dziri, N. (2025). To Err Is AI: A Case Study Informing LLM Flaw Reporting Practices. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 39(28), 28938–28945. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v39i28.35162