On the Structural Hardness of Answer Set Programming: Can Structure Efficiently Confine the Power of Disjunctions?

Authors

  • Markus Hecher Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA
  • Rafael Kiesel TU Wien, Vienna, Austria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i9.28923

Keywords:

KRR: Logic Programming, KRR: Computational Complexity of Reasoning, KRR: Nonmonotonic Reasoning

Abstract

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a generic problem modeling and solving framework with a strong focus on knowledge representation and a rapid growth of industrial applications. So far, the study of complexity resulted in characterizing hardness and determining their sources, fine-grained insights in the form of dichotomy-style results, as well as detailed parameterized complexity landscapes. Unfortunately, for the well-known parameter treewidth disjunctive programs require double-exponential runtime under reasonable complexity assumptions. This quickly becomes out of reach. We deal with the classification of structural parameters for disjunctive ASP on the program's rule structure (incidence graph). First, we provide a polynomial kernel to obtain single-exponential runtime in terms of vertex cover size, despite subset-minimization being not represented in the program’s structure. Then we turn our attention to strictly better structural parameters between vertex cover size and treewidth. Here, we provide double-exponential lower bounds for the most prominent parameters in that range: treedepth, feedback vertex size, and cliquewidth. Based on this, we argue that unfortunately our options beyond vertex cover size are limited. Our results provide an in-depth hardness study, relying on a novel reduction from normal to disjunctive programs, trading the increase of complexity for an exponential parameter compression.

Published

2024-03-24

How to Cite

Hecher, M., & Kiesel, R. (2024). On the Structural Hardness of Answer Set Programming: Can Structure Efficiently Confine the Power of Disjunctions?. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38(9), 10535–10543. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i9.28923

Issue

Section

AAAI Technical Track on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning