Multiwinner Analogues of the Plurality Rule: Axiomatic and Algorithmic Perspectives

Authors

  • Piotr Faliszewski AGH Univesity of Science and Technology
  • Piot Skowron University of Oxford
  • Arkadii Slinko University of Auckland
  • Nimrod Talmon Technische Universitaet Berlin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10031

Keywords:

multiwinner voting, committee scoring rules, top-k-counting rules, fixed-majority criterion, axioms, algorithms

Abstract

We characterize the class of committee scoring rules that satisfy the fixed-majority criterion. In some sense, the committee scoring rules in this class are multiwinner analogues of the single-winner Plurality rule, which is uniquely characterized as the only single-winner scoring rule that satisfies the simple majority criterion. We find that, for most of the rules in our new class, the complexity of winner determination is high (i.e., the problem of computing the winners is NP-hard), but we also show some examples of polynomial-time winner determination procedures, exact and approximate.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-21

How to Cite

Faliszewski, P., Skowron, P., Slinko, A., & Talmon, N. (2016). Multiwinner Analogues of the Plurality Rule: Axiomatic and Algorithmic Perspectives. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v30i1.10031

Issue

Section

Technical Papers: Game Theory and Economic Paradigms