Individual Gain, Collective Loss: Metacognitive Adaptation in AI-Assisted Creativity

Abstract

Recent studies reveal a paradox: AI enhances individual creative outputs while reducing collective diversity. Current explanations—cognitive offloading, over-reliance—identify symptoms but not mechanisms. We propose selective metacognitive adaptation: routine AI use redistributes rather than diminishes metacognitive effort. Some capacities are amplified (partner modeling, surface control), while others are systematically under-supported (originality evaluation, reflective integration). This redistribution explains both individual satisfaction and collective convergence. We present a taxonomy of seven metacognitive capacities organized by temporal phase, characterize their tendencies under routine AI use, and show how individually rational adaptation produces emergent social costs. The framework generates specific predictions for researchers and design principles for practitioners seeking to preserve both individual creative satisfaction and collective creative diversity.