Agentic AI for Robot Control: Flexible but Still Fragile

Authors

  • Oscar Lima German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) Osnabrück University
  • Marc Vinci German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) Osnabrück University
  • Martin Günther German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
  • Marian Renz German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) Osnabrück University
  • Alexander Sung German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
  • Sebastian Stock German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
  • Johannes Brust German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
  • Lennart Niecksch German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) Osnabrück University
  • Zongyao Yi German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) Osnabrück University
  • Felix Igelbrink German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) Osnabrück University
  • Benjamin Kisliuk German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI) Osnabrück University
  • Martin Atzmueller Osnabrück University German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
  • Joachim Hertzberg Osnabrück University German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v8i1.42578

Abstract

Recent work leverages the capabilities and commonsense priors of generative models for robot control. In this paper, we present an agentic control system in which a reasoning-capable language model plans and executes tasks by selecting and invoking robot skills within an iterative planner and executor loop. We deploy the system on two physical robot platforms in two settings: (i) tabletop grasping, placement, and box insertion in indoor mobile manipulation (Mobipick) and (ii) autonomous agricultural navigation and sensing (Valdemar). Both settings involve uncertainty, partial observability, sensor noise, and ambiguous natural-language commands. The system exposes structured introspection of its planning and decision process, reacts to exogenous events via explicit event checks, and supports operator interventions that modify or redirect ongoing execution. Across both platforms, our proof-of-concept experiments reveal substantial fragility, including non-deterministic suboptimal behaviour, instruction-following errors, and high sensitivity to prompt specification. At the same time, the architecture is flexible: transfer to a different robot and task domain largely required updating the system prompt (domain model, affordances, and action catalogue) and re-binding the same tool interface to the platform-specific skill API.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-18

How to Cite

Lima, O., Vinci, M., Günther, M., Renz, M., Sung, A., Stock, S., … Hertzberg, J. (2026). Agentic AI for Robot Control: Flexible but Still Fragile. Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series, 8(1), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v8i1.42578

Issue

Section

Machine Learning and Knowledge Engineering (MAKE 2026)